Speed dating statistics
For example, here are the one-way connections for the first dating session: These are the mutual connections from the same session: So what made one person more dateable than another?
We can look at the pre-date surveys that asked others what they looked for in a partner and what they thought the opposite sex looked for.
It was a 100-point scale, and participants were asked to divide those 100 points between attractiveness, intelligence, fun, sincerity, ambition, and shares the same interest.
I suspect this was partially due to the relatively low number of people with this rating (only 26 of them), and the small group of high-intelligence people collectively had lower attractiveness ratings.On each date, people scored each other on attractiveness, intelligence, ambition, and some other things, along with a to seeing the other person again on a regular date. noted gender differences in mate selection, such as: “Women put greater weight on the intelligence and the race of partner, while men respond more to physical attractiveness.” And this: “Men do not value women’s intelligence or ambition when it exceeds their own.” Seemed like data worth checking out. The point of it all is to match every woman with every man for a short period of time so that by the end, every one has gotten a chance to quickly know each other.In case you’re unfamiliar with the speed dating process, here’s how it works. The assumption is that you can learn a lot about a person in a short period of time.Ambition was also weighted lowest by the men but a few points lower, which matches the results in the paper. Although I thought sharing the same interest would be higher.The contrast between what one group says it wants versus what the opposite the other group wants is interesting.